Andresen v. Maryland

Andresen v. Maryland

Argued February 25, 1976
Decided June 29, 1976
Full case name Peter C. Andresen, Petitioner v. State of Maryland
Citations

427 U.S. 463 (more)

96 S.Ct. 2737; 49 L.Ed.2d 627
Argument Oral argument
Prior history Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Holding
The searches and seizures were not "unreasonable" in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Blackmun, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
Dissent Brennan
Dissent Marshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that search of petitioner's offices for business records, their seizure, and subsequent introduction into evidence did not offend the Fifth Amendment's proscription that “[n]o person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Although the records seized contained statements that petitioner voluntarily had committed to writing, he was never required to say anything.

See also

Further reading

External links


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/13/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.