John Rolph (judge)

For other uses, see John Rolph.
Rear Admiral Bruce MacDonald swears in Captain John Rolph as Deputy Chief Judge of the Court of Military Commission Review.

John Rolph is an American lawyer and officer in the United States Navy's Judge Advocate General corps.[1]

Military career

Captain John Rolph, JAGC, USN served as both an enlisted man and as an officer in the United States Navy during a 35-year career from 1973 until he retired in 2008. He served as an officer in the Judge Advocate General's Corps of the U.S. Navy from 1982 until 2008. He held many legal positions in the Navy, including prosecutor, defense counsel, staff judge advocate, executive officer and commanding officer. He served as the Command Judge Advocate on board the USS Independence (CVA-62) from 1988–1990, was the first Navy instructor/professor of law at the Army JAG School in Charlottesville, VA (International Law Department—1991-1993), and served as the Executive Officer and Commanding Officer of the Naval Legal Service Office in Norfolk, VA (1996–1998). His judicial positions include the following:

Guantanamo challenge

Rolph's appointment was mentioned in a jurisdictional appeal filed by Omar Khadr's lawyers.[4]

Khadr's lawyers had argued that the Military Commissions Act only authorized the Secretary of Defense to appoint a Chief Judge, not a Deputy Chief Judge.[3] And they pointed out that Rolph had been appointed the Deputy Chief Judge not by the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, but also by Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon R. England. In June 2007, in his role as Deputy Chief Judge, Rolph had completed the compilation of the Court's "rules of practice", which he published on June 28, 2007. Deputy Secretary England approved the rules of practice on August 13, 2007. Khadr's lawyers argued that Rolph lacked the jurisdiction to publish the Court's rules of practice—that only the Chief Justice had that authority. And they argued that only the Secretary of Defense had the authority to approve the rules; not his Deputy.

Khadr's lawyers' appeal was heard by the Court of Military Commission Review itself, which ruled, on September 19, 2008, that the Military Commissions Act gave the Secretary of Defense broad discretion in how he delegated the tasks involved in running and overseeing the court, and that the Rolph rules of practice compilation were properly authorized.[3]

References

  1. 1 2 Jason Jones. "Navy Judges Lend Expertise to the Court of Military Commission Review". Archived from the original (PDF) on November 2, 2008. Retrieved 2008-09-11.
  2. Thomas Banda (May–June 2007). "Defining Communities of Practice" (PDF). Navy Judge Advocate General Corps. Retrieved 2008-09-23. Rolph, the “Community Champion,” was instrumental in motivating and encouraging all of the Trial Judiciary to begin routinely and effectively using the NKO discussion forum.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr: Ruling on Motion to dismiss" (PDF). 2007-09-17. Retrieved 2008-09-23.
  4. "Motion for Expedited Oral Argument on Appellee's Motion to Abate Proceedings" (PDF). Department of Defense. 2007-07-20. Retrieved 2008-09-23. That the Appellee's Motion, at the very least, raises a substantial doubt as to the Court's jurisdiction is confirmed by Captain John Rolph's own actions in seeking evidence of the Secretary of Defense's ratification of his appointment from the Department of Defense General Counsel's Office. (See Disclosure Concerning Motion to Abate and Motion to Attach documents, dated 23 July 2007.) This is a threshold jurisdictional matter that must be resolved before the Court takes further filings from the parties or schedules further proceedings in this case.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.