Louis N. Scarcella

Louis N. Scarcella
Nationality American
Occupation retired
Employer New York City Police Department-Brooklyn North Homicide
Known for NYPD police detective

Louis Scarcella is an American NYPD Detective who initially experienced notoriety during the "crack boom" of the 1980s-1990s. As a member of the Brooklyn North Homicide Squad, Scarcella, along with his longtime partner Stephen Chmil, built a reputation for obtaining convictions in difficult cases. More recently, Scarcella has been in the public eye due to a number of convictions having been overturned as a result of the detective's misconduct. As of October 2015, 6 men have had their convictions overturned as a result of Scarcella's involvement and between 40-70 investigations involving Scarcella which led to convictions are under review by the Kings County District Attorney's Office.[1]

Biography

Louis Scarcella grew up in an Italian-American family living in Little Italy of Bensonhurst in Brooklyn. His father, Domenick was an NYPD detective in Manhattan. He studied at the Midwood High School, then served for three years in the US Navy during the Vietnam War. [2] Returned to New York City , he then joined the NYPD Police Academy.

Rigging of evidence to secure convictions

Louis Scarcella and his colleague Stephen W. Chmil rigged evidence to promote their own careers which led to the imprisonment of dozens of innocents. District Attorney Charles J. Hynes reopened the cases of 56 people arrested by Detective Scarcella; at least five cases of Detective Chmil’s (out of 300 deemed probably wrongful) scrutinized by nonprofit Exoneration Initiative made clear that he "invented confessions, coached witnesses and persuaded others to change their descriptions of perpetrators to match the suspect in custody — even in cases he worked without Detective Scarcella".[3] Examples of crimes that Scarcella cajoled other people into confessing to include:

The Legal Aid Society, which represents 20 of the people whose cases were reopened by the Brooklyn district attorney’s office, is concerned that the prosecutors’ review is too narrow, because it is limited to cases in which Detective Scarcella testified in court.[3]

Hynes’s office said it had added about five cases to the review since it was announced in May, but Hynes lost his re-election bid in November. The new district attorney, Kenneth P. Thompson, suggested during the race that he would be open to widening the scope of the review. Thompson is reviewing over 90 cases as of January 2015. However, in January 2015, Thompson announced that his office would endorse 21 disputed convictions, which include 18 by Scarcella.[9]

References

  1. Sean Flynn (August 4, 2014). "Brooklyn's Baddest". gq.com. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
  2. Albert Samaha (August 5, 2014). "The Tragedy of Louis Scarcella". villagevoice.com. Retrieved October 6, 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 Robles, Frances (December 27, 2013). "Louis Scarcella's Ex-Partner Is Coming Under Scrutiny in Brooklyn Cases". nytimes.com. Retrieved April 6, 2014.
  4. Tom Hays (March 30, 2013). "Louis Scarcella, Retired NYPD Detective With Storied Career, Defends Record In David Ranta Case". huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved August 26, 2015.
  5. "David Ranta, 2 days after being exonerated on NY murder charge, suffers heart attack". wn.com. March 24, 2013. Retrieved April 6, 2014.
  6. "Man Framed by Detective Will Get $6.4 Million From New York City After Serving 23 Years for Murder". New York Times. February 20, 2014. Retrieved June 20, 2014.
  7. Michael Powell (March 21, 2013). "Man Jailed in 1990 Killing of a Rabbi Is Released". cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
  8. Robles, Frances, and Stephanie Clifford, "3 Are Exonerated of Murder in Cases Tied to a Discredited Detective", New York Times, May 5, 2014. Retrieved 2014-05-07.
  9. Clifford, Stephanie (12 January 2015). "Brooklyn District Attorney Stands by 21 Convictions, So Far". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/22/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.