Roseville Tunnel

Main article: Lackawanna Cut-Off
The eastern portal of Roseville Tunnel in 1989, five years after the tracks were removed. The hill above was partially blasted away in the aborted effort to create an open cut, not a tunnel.
Eastbound view of the interior of Roseville Tunnel, near the west portal, on April 21, 2011. A 100-foot (30 m) section of concrete lining, applied during the 1970s, failed to eliminate drainage problems.

Roseville Tunnel is a 1,024-foot (312 m)[1] two-track railroad tunnel on the Lackawanna Cut-Off in Byram Township, Sussex County, New Jersey. It is on a straight section of railroad between mileposts 51.6 and 51.8 (83 km), about 6 miles (9.7 km) west of Port Morris Junction. The tunnel was built between 1908 and 1911 by the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (DL&W) as part of the Lackawanna Cut-Off, an immense, spare-no-expense project intended to create the straightest, flattest route for its main line through the mountains of northwestern New Jersey. The contractor was David W. Flickwir of Roanoke, Virginia.[2]

Originally, the DL&W had planned to have a cut, not a tunnel, at this location. At 140 feet (43 m) deep, it would have been the deepest on the Cut-Off. But the rock, described as "bastard granite"[2] (which contractors said had the consistency of Roquefort cheese[3]) was found to be too unstable, and so a tunnel was bored instead. Some 35,000 cubic yards of material were removed to create the bore.[1]

Roseville Tunnel opened on December 24, 1911, and permitted a 70 mph (113 km/hr) speed limit. In 1958, the DL&W single-tracked the line in anticipation of a merger with the Erie Railroad. Its successor, the Erie Lackawanna Railway (EL), shifted the remaining track in the tunnel several feet north to boost clearance for high-and-wide railroad cars. In 1976, Conrail assumed operations of the EL, but would operate the line for less than three years, placing the Cut-Off out of service in January 1979. After a protracted effort to prevent the rail from being removed failed, Conrail pulled up the tracks during the summer of 1984 and subsequently sold the right-of-way to two different land developers. The State of New Jersey acquired the right-of-way in 2001 and in 2011 NJ Transit began re-construction on the line.

Rockslides

A 1988 photo of a rockslide detector in Colby Cut just west of Roseville Tunnel. If a rock broke through the screen, the trackside signals would automatically be set to stop.

New Jersey geology makes rockslides, which can derail trains, a constant threat in deep cuts. After the Cut-Off was closed for a month by a 1941 slide in Armstrong Cut just west of Johnsonburg, DL&W brought in heavy equipment to lessen the slope on the cut's northern side, making it nearly impossible for another rockslide to occur there.

But Roseville proved to be a different matter. Unless the Lackawanna was willing to close the line for a prolonged period, there was no way to safely scale back the tall, steep rockwalls through Colby Cut, the tunnel's western approach. Instead, after the Armstrong Cut Slide, the DL&W paid a shantyman to watch for fallen rocks at Roseville. A hand-thrown switch had already been installed in 1913 to allow trains to shift tracks if one were blocked by fallen rocks, indicating that the railroad was acutely aware of the potential threat from almost the very beginning.[4] In later years (probably around 1950), electronic detectors were installed that could automatically set trackside signals to red if rocks broke through the detector fencing. In the 1970s, a concrete lining was applied to the westernmost 133 feet (41 m)[5] of the tunnel to prevent rockfalls inside. This work did not prevent chunks of rock from dislodging later on, after the abandonment of the Cut-Off.

Rehabilitation for Andover service

In 2011, New Jersey Transit received approval to re-lay 7.3 miles (11.8 km) of track from Port Morris Junction through the tunnel in order to open commuter rail service westward to Andover, New Jersey.

The tunnel work, as stated in the invitation to bidders, will include: "removal of loose rock, rock bolting to secure unstable rock blocks, repair of the existing concrete tunnel liner, installation of a membrane liner that will provide a continuous tunnel waterproofing system, installation of CCTV cameras at both portals, and installation of a lighted pedestrian path inside the tunnel that extends a minimum of 50 feet (15 m) beyond both portals. A radio system must also be installed that provides radio signal and coverage inside the tunnel. The requirements will also include rock excavation from the west tunnel portal, effectively reducing the overall tunnel length by a minimum of 15 feet (4.6 m). The work also includes railroad track bed excavation, initial ballast placement, and rock excavation and slope protection and stabilization of loose and potentially loose rock on both the west and east rock cut approaches to the tunnel. This slope protection shall address rockfall hazard protection including construction of adequate catchment areas, the installation of cable mesh and/or netting, vegetation and tree removal, removal of loose rock and rock bolting to secure unstable blocks. The protection shall extend approximately 1,700 feet (520 m) from the west portal and 200 feet (61 m) from the east portal. The work also includes a section of track roadbed restoration beyond the west portal, including cutting, clearing, and disposal of all brush, trees, and vegetative matter, and its drainage system, approximately 8,000 feet (2460 m) long."[6]

This work is to be completed within 730 days, or about two years. In all, the Roseville Tunnel part of the reactivation project will cost $24 million. The re-opening of the line to Andover is slated for late 2018.[6]

Coordinates: 40°58′16″N 74°42′38″W / 40.971043°N 74.710550°W / 40.971043; -74.710550

Notes

  1. 1 2 Taber & Taber 1980, p. 35
  2. 1 2 Dana, Richard Turner; William Lawrence Saunders; Construction Service Company (1911). "Rock drilling: with particular reference to open cut excavation and submarine rock removal". J. Wiley & Sons. pp. 99–106. Retrieved November 15, 2012.
  3. The Lackawanna Railroad in Northwestern New Jersey by Larry Lowenthal and William T. Greenberg, Jr., p. 75, Tri-State Railway Historical Society, Inc., 1987.
  4. "What Signal Departments Are Doing: A Summary of Some of the Big Work of the Last Few Months and Some Plans for the Future". Railway Signaling and Communications, Volume 7. Simmons-Boardman. January 1914. p. 19. Retrieved November 15, 2012.
  5. http://www.njtransit.com/pdf/LackawannaEAJune2008.pdf
  6. 1 2 "Request for Special Pre-Qualification DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROSEVILLE TUNNEL REHABILITATION In Byram Township, Sussex County, New Jersey". Invitation For Bid No. 16-008X. NJ Transit. p. 4. Retrieved October 27, 2016.

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/29/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.